<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Benhamreview | Dave Benham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/tag/review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davebenham.co.uk</link>
	<description>Photography, web and words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 50mm AF-S f/1.4G lens – First impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.davebenham.co.uk/7/nikon-50mm-af-s-f14g-lens-first-impressions.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.davebenham.co.uk/7/nikon-50mm-af-s-f14g-lens-first-impressions.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AF-S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davebenham.co.uk/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-74" href="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/?attachment_id=74"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-74" title="Nikkor AF-S 50mm F/1.4G" src="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/50mm.jpg" alt="Nikkor AF-S 50mm F/1.4G" width="431" height="408" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always loved a 50mm lens from my film days &#8211; my parents purchased a Minolta 50mm f/1.8 lens for my trusty <a title="Minolta Dynax 600si at Camerapedia" href="http://www.camerapedia.org/wiki/Minolta_Dynax_600si_Classic" target="_blank">Minolta Dynax 600si</a> and it was to become an almost&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-74" href="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/?attachment_id=74"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-74" title="Nikkor AF-S 50mm F/1.4G" src="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/50mm.jpg" alt="Nikkor AF-S 50mm F/1.4G" width="431" height="408" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always loved a 50mm lens from my film days &#8211; my parents purchased a Minolta 50mm f/1.8 lens for my trusty <a title="Minolta Dynax 600si at Camerapedia" href="http://www.camerapedia.org/wiki/Minolta_Dynax_600si_Classic" target="_blank">Minolta Dynax 600si</a> and it was to become an almost permanent fixture on my camera. I&#8217;ve wanted a 50mm lens for my Nikon system for a while and my friends and colleagues <a title="Mark Wheatley Photography" href="http://www.mark-wheatley.co.uk" target="_self">Mark Wheatley</a> and <a title="Phil Cowan" href="http://www.phil-cowan.co.uk" target="_blank">Phil Cowan</a> both love the f/1.8 version. I held myself back when I heard there was a new AF-S version of the lens arriving.</p>
<p>Why do we love a 50mm lens so much? For me it was the closest representation to what my eyes were looking at &#8211; now I appreciate far more the benefits of the large aperture for low light photography and the creative effect of bokeh.</p>
<p>I purchased my lens from <a title="Mifsuds Photographic" href="http://www.mifsuds.com" target="_blank">Mifsuds</a> in Brixham, and the next day I was eagerly adding it to my D700. As much as I love my <a title="Nikkor 24-70 AF-S" href="http://www.europe-nikon.com/product/en_GB/products/broad/1431/overview.html" target="_blank">AF-S 24-70 f/2.8</a> it is a heavy lens for everyday use, and the difference in weight is understandably staggering. The wide maximum aperture of f/1.4 and integration of the AF-S motor does make this a little more bulky than the earlier f/1.4 and f/1.8 models, but it handles well and looks a little less like a toy!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-68" href="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/?attachment_id=68"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-68" title="Harry on the shelf" src="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/cupboard.jpg" alt="Harry on the shelf" width="500" height="476" /></a>Harry sitting on the bookshelf, 1/30 at f/1.4, ISO 720</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Once I&#8217;d got used to the minimum focusing distance I realised just how good this lens is &#8211; even in virtual darkness you can lock in on individual details. The extra couple of stops makes for a supremely bright viewfinder too.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-77" href="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/?attachment_id=77"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-77" title="Tinsel" src="http://www.davebenham.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tinsel.jpg" alt="Tinsel" width="500" height="401" /></a>Tinsel, 1/30 at f/1.4, ISO 1100</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So now I have pretty much my ideal kit bag &#8211; the 24-70, 50mm standard lens and the 70-300 zoom. In a perfect world I&#8217;d have the <a title="Nikkor 70-200 AF-S VR" href="http://www.europe-nikon.com/product/en_GB/products/broad/634/overview.html" target="_blank">70-200 f/2.8</a> lens and a wide lens &#8211; the 14-24mm for example &#8211; but budget won&#8217;t stretch that far and realistically at the moment I&#8217;ve got what I need. I think the 24-70 will be the weapon of choice as I crave the flexibility and 24mm on a full frame camera is actually &#8211; 24mm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davebenham.co.uk/7/nikon-50mm-af-s-f14g-lens-first-impressions.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

